..... nobody is in the position to tell anyone how much of his discretionary income that he should use to invest in bitcoin. ....
Many of us use the term aggressive for someone who chooses a high percentage of his discretionary income to invest in bitcoin and the term whimpy to describe someone who chooses a low percentage of his discretionary income to invest in bitcoin, and these should be considered as merely ways to emphasize one direction or another, even though in the end, each person needs to figure out his level of aggressiveness or his level of whimpiness.
Furthermore, there could be other funds that a person has at the time that they get into bitcoin that they might choose to allocate some of those funds into bitcoin, and they may choose whimpy levels or more aggressive levels, and surely they are personal choices - even though I personally suggest that guys should invest into bitcoin as aggressively as they are able to do without over doing it.. yet in the end, they have to decide for themselves, even though I am making a bit of a value judgement suggestion that may or may not be agreeable to another person to have that same orientation.
By the way, I also acknowledge that so many folks, perhaps 99% of the world's population are no coiners and/or low coiners, so surely even folks who decide to get into bitcoin whimpily are likely going to be better off as compared with those folks who continue to decide to not get involved in bitcoin and/or not to look into bitcoin further so that they can decide to whether to get into bitcoin based on an informed position rather than based on a likely lack of looking into bitcoin.
First off investing on Bitcoin is a choice so it's the investors choice to choose whether they want to be aggressive or whimpy so far they're doing it the right way, I think everyone should invest according to the amount of discretionary they have you don't force someone to be aggressive cause you can afford investing aggressively at the end the person might want to overdo it and even use funds outside their discretionary to invest.
I don't think it's a bad idea to start slowly then add pace one can i know some people would prefer that new investors start very aggressively but what if their discretionary or the income they generate doesn't permit them to, that's what those folks who think those set of people should be aggressive should consider. Anyways it's even better to start slowly than never atleast those whimper folks would still be on the profit side in the future when or if Bitcoin gets $1m as we all hope it will.