Many of us use the term aggressive for someone who chooses a high percentage of his discretionary income to invest in bitcoin and the term whimpy to describe someone who chooses a low percentage of his discretionary income to invest in bitcoin, and these should be considered as merely ways to emphasize one direction or another, even though in the end, each person needs to figure out his level of aggressiveness or his level of whimpiness.
Furthermore, there could be other funds that a person has at the time that they get into bitcoin that they might choose to allocate some of those funds into bitcoin, and they may choose whimpy levels or more aggressive levels, and surely they are personal choices - even though I personally suggest that guys should invest into bitcoin as aggressively as they are able to do without over doing it.. yet in the end, they have to decide for themselves, even though I am making a bit of a value judgement suggestion that may or may not be agreeable to another person to have that same orientation.. so then in the end, each of us are ultimately responsible to make our choice regarding whether or not we get into bitcoin and the level of aggressiveness and then to live with the consequences of acting and/or failing to act.
By the way, I also acknowledge that so many folks, perhaps 99% of the world's population are no coiners and/or low coiners, so surely even folks who decide to get into bitcoin whimpily are likely going to be better off as compared with those folks who continue to decide to not get involved in bitcoin and/or not to look into bitcoin further so that they can decide to whether to get into bitcoin based on an informed position rather than based on a likely lack of looking into bitcoin. So, I remain of the perspective that something is better than nothing, even though at the same time, I think that everyone should attempt to accumulate bitcoin as aggressively as they can without over doing it and to continue with such behaviors until they reach enough or more than enough bitcoin (which again is a value judgement regarding how much bitcoin is enough or more than enough).
JJG Sir I know you are talking about investing in Bitcoin with the maximum amount of one's discretionary income as an aggressive buy where the current price is not a factor.
But people think that they will keep buying Bitcoin in DCA method and when the price goes to DIP they will buy it aggressively.
My question to all these people is where will the money come from to buy aggressively? But will they just sit and wait for DIP and keep accumulating money?
I feel sorry for those who think like that because they are walking on the wrong path and they will have to pay for it.
If we keep investing the maximum amount of our discretionary income in Bitcoin then we will not have to regret it if the price of Bitcoin goes up. And if the price goes down then if you want then as JJG Sir said that a person can have many more funds then he can allocate some money from that bill to Bitcoin.
So according to JJG Sir, if you want to prove yourself as a smart investor, you should always buy Bitcoin (aggressively) with the maximum amount of your discretionary income can't wait for DIP.
I don't agree with your definition of aggressive buying, the part of your discretionary income whether it is the maximum part or the minimum part you chooses to invest with is your own level of aggressiveness, it is not a measure of how large you are investing but a measure of how much you can comfortably use to buy Bitcoin because that is what your risk level can carry, buying Bitcoin with the maximum amount of your discretionary income doesn't make anyone a Smart investor, it is ideally that you invest according to your own risk tolerance level investment goals and objectives and this will be differs by different investors.