Someone said that Bitcoin is for the rich, but that's not completely true. It might feel like Bitcoin is for the rich due to the media focuses on celebrities and billionaires buying and benefiting from Bitcoin. This creates a perception that Bitcoin is a rich person's asset. Even during network congestion, fees can spike making small transactions very expensive. But let's not forget that Bitcoin is neutral, it can empower the rich or help lift the poor, it actually depends on how communities adopt it. So understand that Bitcoin is for everyone, you can buy tiny fractions, not until you afford a whole Bitcoin.
@Op, I can't agree with you completely. If we look at history, we can see that Bitcoin has never made a difference between people. Bitcoin has its own momentum. If someone can match this momentum, then he will definitely benefit in the long run. Since there is only a supply of 21 million Bitcoins, its demand will increase day by day.
But yes, a rich person can easily hold Bitcoin if he wants. Because he has that amount of money deposited with him. But on the other hand, a poor person should think very carefully about every step. His every step should be for the good of the future. And that is why we invest in Bitcoin. Because it is a digital asset. We can invest in Bitcoin partially again and again. Which benefits the poor in the long run. So I would like to say, Bitcoin is a universal monetary system. It never differentiates between the rich and the poor.