Thank you, @BK8.Official, for responding publicly.

And thanks @TravelMug for voicing a very valid point.

I want to clarify again that I simply observed patterns in a publicly available, live game and made bets accordingly, like card counting in blackjack or trend analysis in trading. This is not cheating; it’s strategic.

The game in question was open and available to everyone. It had no notice of malfunction, and bets were accepted normally. At first, I was able to transfer my winnings from the  game provider's wallet to BK8 main wallet successfully. I attempted to withdraw on the first day, then on the second day, my account was suspended and everything voided, without showing specific proof of any "irregular play."

BK8 is not just a channel. It is the licensed host of the platform, and with that comes the responsibility to ensure the fairness, transparency, and accountability of the games offered. Players have no direct relationship with the game provider. We trust and play on BK8, not on the backend service. I believe BK8 should take responsibility for resolving this fairly, rather than passing the final decision to the provider.

If a game was poorly designed or not resilient to certain strategies, that should fall under the provider’s responsibility, not the player's. Voiding bets retroactively after a win sets a dangerous precedent where players are only allowed to lose.

I believe in fairness, and I respect BK8’s previous reputation. I still hope for a reconsideration or at least more transparency on what exactly is being labeled an "exploit."