Jackson was among the average players that was bought by the former coach of Chelsea and since that time, I haven't seen any significant impact that he has made in order for the club to achieve success. This is the main reason why I am against the swap of Gnarcho to Jackson because it's like moving from fry pan to fire. He has been given several opportunities to make a difference but he couldn't.
You call that deal from frying pan to fire? Nicholas Jackson is not good enough and we all agree on that but Manchester united should bless their God if that deal happen. Without sentiment or being bias, which of the Manchester United forward can confidently beat their chest and say they're better than Jackson with statistically proven fact? Absolutely none. Jackson can be a flop at Chelsea but can't be compare with any Manchester united forward. The only thing that seems to make this deal unnecessary for Manchester united is because they already made some good signings to improve their front otherwise, Jackson will have been a good addition to their bunch of ineffective players in that front.