If any REPUTABLE member thinks I should reconsider any of my tags (especially regarding AI) PLEASE don't even think twice before asking me. I have a policy of removing my tag after a certain number of posts (which differs from case to case but usually between 70-100). Below is an example of a typical PM I get (personal details removed) and my usual response (number of posts may vary). IMO, getting an AI tag should be a chance to improve post quality.
What is your policy for revising the AI tag?

I deleted the tag from this user only because I understood that he would still have it, knowing your method. In addition, I did not add a reference link, but my history contained his deleted posts with AI in case of his objections. After that, he publicly admitted that he used AI but promised to stop such behavior in the future. I see that the user introduced himself as a newbie, although now I doubt it again and think that he is someone's alt. Therefore, continue your policy of control, but this "newbie" must understand that once he has promised not to use AI and received trust and a chance in what he said, upon repeated detection, he can grab a red tag as an abuse of trust, which seems much worse. I do not delete PM.