Why do so many crypto projects talk about “utility” when what they’re really offering is speculation dressed up with buzzwords?
It is because what the people is asking for and with them, they're not giving an actual utility but only an answer to the demand without actually doing it.
We’re told a token has "utility" because it can be staked or used in a game or gives access to some vague future roadmap. But real utility should solve real problems problems like trust, verification,
and liquidity in an ecosystem plagued by scams, misinformation, and illiquid assets.
That's right, real world issues and problems and utilities should be solving these real world problems.
what's your own standard way of judging project utility ?
It's simple, a real use case. There is a real world application where these tokens are being spent, and incentivized to its holders.
Most projects just meet demand with surface-level features: slap on staking, add a roadmap, and call it “utility.” But that’s not solving anything.
Real utility = real-world application + clear incentive structure + problem-solving.
i stumbled upon a project listed on bingx called Aspecta it's just an interesting to me, but might still be a utility game a the end