But people have a habit to change their decisions. 35 years ago I wanted to be a firefighter. After many years, I have chosen different profession. People opinion change with time, after a decision. Not saying that casinos should immediately welcome their former clients who have chosen self exclusion, but will it be bad if a gambler returns after 10 years? From ToS - yes, as solution would be having another account. From moral point of view - I would give a chance if a person really wants to return.
we don't know if there's a cost to maitain an account (monetary cost or maybe some extra difficult or time needed by the support, I don't know) but in general I'd agree with you
it would be better if the accounts are not deleted or banned after innactive use
it's normal to do something for a while, stop doing it and come back again even if after many years.
I also believe that inactive accounts should not be deleted no matter how long they remain dormant, and there should not be any fees imposed on them as they do not cost the system anything. Any platform that occupies itself with those accounts is likely trying to achieve returns even though they cost nothing.
Really wonder how you suddenly came across that post in the quote which was published one month ago in page 278 as we are now in page 291. Do you have a favorite pastime to scroll in bcgame ANN thread and read old posts? Sorry if this comment may bother you in anyway. No offense Bro. I just think it's a little bit strange to reply to an old post that isn't even have that quality to worth reply after one month since first posted.