Throughout the existence of USDT, there have been constant accusations that the stablecoin does not have full collateral. Well, what about it? USDT has been, and still is, and will be, despite all the FUD that has been spreading regularly. In fact, the question of fully reserving USDT is even ridiculous if you think about what the dollar is backed by?
If you think about it, it is indeed a bad thing, where the dollar is only based on trust to see its value, with no underlying value behind it, and even the petro dollar, which was the last defense of value measurement, is no longer valid.
So far, is this just FUD or not, because stablecoins have many competitors, so the attacks take many forms, even issues like not being pegged 1:1, which have been around for a long time but there is no evidence to suggest they are violating any rules.