Do you agree with this observation? Would you agree that it's better to not increase your needs in first place?
The truth is that needs are always needs, and they are something very important in someone life. What I understand about a need is that it's something someone can't do without. If that is the case, the someone will surely look for a way to get it. So, to me, when someone increases their needs it's not necessarily a bad thing because it is something important to their life.and owing a car and not later owing it again should not be disattraction to us for trying to get car when someone knows it important to them.
But what is also important is that if something has not yet become a need, it is better not to see it as one. For example, now, if someone is a company worker, like in some companies that assist their workers with transportation in some part of my country, a bus may come to pick them up in the morning and also take them home after work, for this kind of person, I would not say a car has become a need.however, for someone whose workplace is far, or where it is not easy to find transportation for example, if they need to get to the office early but would be late due to transport issues then a car has become a need for that kind of person.
Needs are essentials we can't do without as they become a necessary things that makes life comfortable and meaningful to the individual. If you should have a car that means it was a need that was necessary and not having it later on by selling it off that means it has served it needful-ness and therefore no longer a need. Living life with this mindset on things we once had and no longer serve us or due to conditions we had to sell them off, we can be peaceful and get used to the current conditions as they evolve.