90% of your explanations are a proof you have no idea what you are talking about. Baby steps using N/2 table size? Kangaroos using scalar multiplications being slower? What's the Point in answering if you cannot answer a simple question?
Cricktor was spot on with his answer, and guess what, he didn't fuck it up, while you did trying to show off as the grand expert, but instead adding more confusion to an already garbage thread.
Lmao it was a simple example to show why some algorithms are faster. And yes scalar multiplication is slower than point addition otherwise give me proof.
Looks like you also fall into the category of people who cannot read properly. Lmao.
Looks like you also fall into the category of people who think they understand how things work, but they really don't.
There is no scalar multiplication used in Kangaroo (or at least not even a single one more than what it's also used for BSGS when parallelizing it).
Also not my fault you are giving BSGS demonstrations that use 11 steps for solving instead of 7. It just creates confusion in understanding the principles.