Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Tether (USDT) - Is pretending to be audited.
by
Abiky
on 02/08/2025, 01:03:45 UTC
Don't compare like that and think USDC is more reliable if you don't know why USDT refuses to comply with Mica. The reason tether is not compliant with MiCA and wants to leave the market is because this law requires all stablecoins to keep their reserves in accredited banks in the EU. Meanwhile, Tether is registered in the UK and operates outside the EU and does not have a legal branch in the EU like USDC. To comply with Mica, Tether would have to restructure the company, spend money to transfer reserves, and face a host of other legal troubles. Therefore, they chose to accept leaving the EU market and instead, they chose a simpler solution for themselves by partnering with Quantoz Payments to create mica compliant EURq, USDq.

USDT is not Mica compliant but I wouldn't be surprised if they were US GENIUS Act compliant as the US market is much more important. The GENIUS Act will come into effect soon and we will know if USDT is trustworthy or not.

Let the regulators take care of Tether. If the company is doing everything legitimately as it claims to be doing, it will all come to light. Otherwise, Tether will see its demise soon. USDC has an advantage over USDT with its MiCA compliance. It's widely open for the EU market. This will enable greater liquidity in the long run.

The competition is getting fierce now with PayPal and Ripple launching stablecoins of their own. Will Tether withstand the pressure from its rivals? Only time will tell...