Don't compare like that and think USDC is more reliable if you don't know why USDT refuses to comply with Mica. The reason tether is not compliant with MiCA and wants to leave the market is because this law requires all stablecoins to keep their reserves in accredited banks in the EU. Meanwhile, Tether is registered in the UK and operates outside the EU and does not have a legal branch in the EU like USDC. To comply with Mica, Tether would have to restructure the company, spend money to transfer reserves, and face a host of other legal troubles. Therefore, they chose to accept leaving the EU market and instead, they chose a simpler solution for themselves by partnering with Quantoz Payments to create mica compliant EURq, USDq.
USDT is not Mica compliant but I wouldn't be surprised if they were US GENIUS Act compliant as the US market is much more important. The GENIUS Act will come into effect soon and we will know if USDT is trustworthy or not.
While that is true, and you are 100% right, that doesn't make them a legit company. I am sure that we are going to end up with how things change, and that is the most important part. We need to see how this is quite good, and this will not be that weird, we just need to see how things can change.
Tether is still a horrible company that can crash at any given moment, even one big legal trouble with USA and they are gone. So do not assume this would be decent, it's as bad as it gets. We need to see both USDC and USDT as dangerous stuff, and can't really see this as a way to move forward. We need to get rid of stablecoins, and figure out something else instead of them, it would be a lot better, we shouldn't trust some companies with our money.