On August 1, 2025, the user pooya87 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=379147 left me a negative feedback stating:
This statement is false, defamatory, and grossly misrepresents the content and intent of my posts.
Here is a point-by-point refutation:
1. I do not spread propaganda of terrorist groups.
2. I do not spread propaganda of Israel.
3. Moreover, I have not justified the actions of Israel.
4. I have not justified al-Qaeda or ISIS.
5. In fact, I have never even mentioned al-Qaeda or ISIS in my posts.
6. I have not expressed or displayed any form of radicalism.
First of all — and most importantly — my criticism was aimed directly at pooya87 himself.
I called him an Iranian propagandist and “my gentle, sweet, tender little piglet.”
I criticized Iranian anti-Western propaganda, drawing explicit parallels between Iranian terrorist propaganda and Soviet disinformation — as well as the propaganda of Putin’s regime in Russia.
I was mocking pooya87 for parroting the same narratives used by the USSR and modern Russia. I did it sarcastically and for entertainment.
I also exposed various anti-Western manipulation tactics used by pooya87 and pointed out that these methods are aimed at naïve Europeans who lack critical thinking skills.
All of this is publicly verifiable, for example in this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5551741.0
Secondly, pooya87 writes in my trust feedback:
“Their radicalism and abusive language trying to silence the truth is clear in the ref.”
LOL — he literally calls me “they”.
An Iranian using woke gender terminology… while people with such identities would face a much more tragic fate in Iran.
I absolutely protest being called “they.” I’m a white, hairy, fat, strong, jacked dude. My pronouns are HE/HIM.
Thirdly, I honestly don’t even care about the trust itself — I almost treat it as free advertising for my anti-propaganda efforts in the Western world.
However, I do care about fairness:
If I’m going to be accused of something, let it be for what I actually did.
So I’d like pooya87 to reword his feedback truthfully — for example:
“This idiot keeps interfering with my anti-American, anti-European, and anti-Western propaganda. He mocks me and also mocks totalitarian regimes. How dare he?!”
Fourth — now seriously.
The accusation that I’m “whitewashing” al-Qaeda and ISIS is a serious defamatory claim.
It’s false, harmful, and entirely unsupported by any evidence.
P.S. I fully understand that pooya87 left this feedback in response to the negative feedback I gave him earlier. That’s fair. But even in retaliation, accusations should remain factual. I have never — and will never — justify al-Qaeda or ISIS.
P.S.2. If I chose the wrong section, I kindly ask the moderators to forgive me—I was genuinely trying to find the correct section for this topic.
Quote
Spreads propaganda of terrorist groups to whitewash crimes against humanity committed by the Zionist regime aka Israel and its terrorist proxies including al-Qaeda and ISIS. Crimes they have been found guilty of by the International Court.
Their radicalism and abusive language trying to silence the truth is clear in the ref.
Their radicalism and abusive language trying to silence the truth is clear in the ref.
This statement is false, defamatory, and grossly misrepresents the content and intent of my posts.
Here is a point-by-point refutation:
1. I do not spread propaganda of terrorist groups.
2. I do not spread propaganda of Israel.
3. Moreover, I have not justified the actions of Israel.
4. I have not justified al-Qaeda or ISIS.
5. In fact, I have never even mentioned al-Qaeda or ISIS in my posts.
6. I have not expressed or displayed any form of radicalism.
First of all — and most importantly — my criticism was aimed directly at pooya87 himself.
I called him an Iranian propagandist and “my gentle, sweet, tender little piglet.”
I criticized Iranian anti-Western propaganda, drawing explicit parallels between Iranian terrorist propaganda and Soviet disinformation — as well as the propaganda of Putin’s regime in Russia.
I was mocking pooya87 for parroting the same narratives used by the USSR and modern Russia. I did it sarcastically and for entertainment.
I also exposed various anti-Western manipulation tactics used by pooya87 and pointed out that these methods are aimed at naïve Europeans who lack critical thinking skills.
All of this is publicly verifiable, for example in this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5551741.0
Secondly, pooya87 writes in my trust feedback:
“Their radicalism and abusive language trying to silence the truth is clear in the ref.”
LOL — he literally calls me “they”.
An Iranian using woke gender terminology… while people with such identities would face a much more tragic fate in Iran.
I absolutely protest being called “they.” I’m a white, hairy, fat, strong, jacked dude. My pronouns are HE/HIM.
Thirdly, I honestly don’t even care about the trust itself — I almost treat it as free advertising for my anti-propaganda efforts in the Western world.
However, I do care about fairness:
If I’m going to be accused of something, let it be for what I actually did.
So I’d like pooya87 to reword his feedback truthfully — for example:
“This idiot keeps interfering with my anti-American, anti-European, and anti-Western propaganda. He mocks me and also mocks totalitarian regimes. How dare he?!”
Fourth — now seriously.
The accusation that I’m “whitewashing” al-Qaeda and ISIS is a serious defamatory claim.
It’s false, harmful, and entirely unsupported by any evidence.
P.S. I fully understand that pooya87 left this feedback in response to the negative feedback I gave him earlier. That’s fair. But even in retaliation, accusations should remain factual. I have never — and will never — justify al-Qaeda or ISIS.
P.S.2. If I chose the wrong section, I kindly ask the moderators to forgive me—I was genuinely trying to find the correct section for this topic.