Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: False and defamatory negative trust from pooya87
by
farsky
on 03/08/2025, 18:25:31 UTC
I am pretty sure that all this drama will end if op chose to delete his negative feedback on pooya profile instead of creating more drama.
No, I will not delete it. This is not a matter of bargaining.
However, I have never accused pooya87 of anything I cannot prove.
Meanwhile, pooya87 accused me of supporting Al-Qaeda and ISIS — and that is a lie.

This is your comment on pooya profile: "pooya87 actively spreads disinformation, echoing narratives of authoritarian regimes (Iran, Russia). His rhetoric is anti-Western, relying on lies and manipulation to undermine Western society. His posts are not mere opinions, but part of an ideological campaign to justify terrorism and discredit free societies."
yes

You accused him to justify terrorism because you think Iran and Russia are terrorist regimes. Then he accused you to defend Al-Qaeda and ISIS because you represent western doctrine (what you called free societies) leaded by the USA, Israel and NATO countries. Those countries considered terrorist regimes as well because they defend/finance terrorism arround the world based on pooya interpretations which many others share as well.

I ask you not to distort the essence of the situation.
Yes, I consider Russia and Iran to be terrorist states (you forgot about the USSR — I also consider that country a terrorist state, even though it no longer exists).
But that would be just my personal opinion.

However, no — I am not the only one who considers these countries to be terrorist states.

Iran is officially listed by the United States as a “State Sponsor of Terrorism” (among four countries: Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Syria).

As for Russia:
The European Parliament has recognized Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism.
The NATO Parliamentary Assembly has designated the Russian regime as terrorist.
The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly adopted a resolution recognizing Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism.
The national parliaments of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, the Netherlands, and Ukraine have all passed similar resolutions at the national level.
The U.S. Senate passed a resolution urging the U.S. Department of State to designate Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism.
The U.S. House of Representatives also passed a resolution in 2022 calling for such a classification.
However, it must be clearly stated that the U.S. Department of State has not included Russia in the official list of State Sponsors of Terrorism.


BUT  Smiley
Let’s not turn this thread into a political debate.

The core of this topic is that pooya87 slandered me. He explicitly accused me of supporting ISIS and Al-Qaeda.
And he cannot prove it — because I have never, anywhere, justified ISIS or Al-Qaeda.

pooya87 simply lied.

He could have just insulted me in a comment to his review — he could have written that I’m a delusional idiot.
But instead, he chose to lie.

Am I surprised that an Iranian propagandist lies? Of course not.
But he exposed himself as a liar — and he will remain a liar forever.

Bringing the community’s attention to the fact that he is a liar — that was my goal.



I support the analysis of pooya and i think NATO, Israel, USA are responsible for all the evil in earth actually. (I also think that Russia and Iran are authoritarian regimes). But i have no problem discussing topics with people defending those regimes for other various reasons. Do you think i deserve a Red-Tag too? Ok then go and tag at least half of users posting in P&S board. However I will never leave a negative trust in your profile because of difference of view in political readings of what actually happening in the world. This is childish behavior and doesn't deserve all the show you bring to the table.

I talk like this because you first tag pooya, however i don't agree with pooya's rating on your profile as well.
I haven’t seen your posts in the Politics section.
But as far as I can judge from your words here, your rhetoric is argumentative, not propagandistic.
That’s the key difference — you are not a propagandist.

Nice that you are not an active user in P&S board because you will spend much more time in Reputation board defending your ratings in different profiles.
I ended up there by accident and I'm unlikely to be a frequent guest.


There was indeed one insulting remark from my side — I acknowledge that.
But the rest of my messages were reasoned, though mocking in tone.

There is more than one insulting remark, most of your posts contain ad hominem attacks calling people Nazis, piglets and Russian propagandists whenever they disagree with you, in addition to vulgar sexual references.
Yes, my words are harsh, but not offensive.
And certainly, a comment about a little piglet cannot be considered offensive — they are clean and cute animals.

But most importantly — my words contain many facts and comparisons.
Primarily, I am exposing Iranian propaganda, not pooya87.

exemple https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5551741.msg65645757#msg65645757


My messages were written in Russian and translated using ChatGPT, because Google Translate is not reliable enough.
So your claim about the content or tone of my messages is simply not true.

I guess you are trying to imply that translators are woke or some nonsense, which would be a dumb way to excuse your spamming of slop content.
(Your phrase doesn’t make sense to me.)
I was trying to say that when users read the forum through a translator, they don’t always understand what the other person is trying to say — because not everyone expresses their thoughts in English.