Bump for holy. This whole thing is wrong and very misleading. I ‘ll post more if you want.
On another note, there is very little to discuss with this case. Bet Fury didn’t pay the winning tickets because the player was considered high risk. They also think they can cancel bets gone final. Let’s not make this complicated.
Show me one case where it takes more than 10 minutes to determine if a bet should be paid because a player is considered high risk.
On another note, there is very little to discuss with this case. Bet Fury didn’t pay the winning tickets because the player was considered high risk. They also think they can cancel bets gone final. Let’s not make this complicated.
Show me one case where it takes more than 10 minutes to determine if a bet should be paid because a player is considered high risk.
And which part is the misinformation? To protect BetFury? That data you quoted, of which I spent hours to consolidate and crosscheck, simply shows facts of what game ended up in loses and what game ended in winnings. So which part from the quoted message that is a misinformation?
Or on more posts, as you hinted?