--snip--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for your question — and it’s a good one.
No, I’m not using QR codes or camera scanning between devices.
What I’m building is not a cold-wallet model or standard airgapped QR flow. It’s something more direct and unconventional, where data is exchanged between devices without traditional I/O or connectivity (no QR, no Bluetooth, no NFC, no Wi-Fi).
The fact that the transaction is valid is just a byproduct — the real innovation is in how the TX gets from device A to B. and it gets Globally! not like 10 meters away!
No offense, but from my perspective it's either have limited practicality, fictional or revolutionary.
I understand your point — but I’d argue that “offline TX” usually means just signing offline and broadcasting later. What I’ve done includes transmission too — without any external connection.
That’s what I believe is the novelty here.
My point is those points aren't exactly "Key features" or outstanding compared with today's offline signing.
I appreciate your honest feedback — and I understand your hesitation.
I agree: most so-called "offline crypto" solutions today just mean signing on one device and broadcasting later via QR or USB. What I’m working on includes the full peer-to-peer transmission layer — without using traditional proximity-based channels like Bluetooth, NFC, or LoRa. And yes, the distance is global — not just short-range.
I'm intentionally vague about the core method here, not because it’s vaporware, but because the system is still under private protection and not public domain. That said, I’m happy to show more (privately, under NDA if needed) to people who are serious and experienced — like yourself.
Whether it ends up being revolutionary or just “novel but niche,” time will tell. But it’s fully tested and working as of now.
Appreciate your time, and your reply. you can contact me if you want by email
aristotelis187@gmail.com