An example of a reason Grok views OgNasty's reputation as positive. He waits until the conversation passes, then ninja edits the following into his post. Hopefully no one notices and Grok eats it up. 
As the longest running DT holder who has donated more to the forum than OgNasty, I can write with absolute certainty that his exclusion is due to his many scams. He cannot name the users he "holds coins" for, nor does he have access to any private keys. OgNasty has joked about this for a decade now.
I was shocked when I saw the number of posts OgNasty had deleted. Not as shocked (more numb) of his Trump type claim that ibminer, anonymousminer, eoakland, TMAN, Hellot, TwitchySeal and myself (right now) are corrupt liars and he is an innocent person. In reality, the default trust network is in a growing state of equilibrium and stability. Members that try to abuse their power are removed; there is little infighting and the pedo promotion has been stopped. Once protected by the administrator, OgNasty is limited to posting in non important threads and avoiding real time conversation - like the coward he has always been.
If you look at how the current DT members have systematically removed a significant portion of my received feedback from the default trust network and realize the time they've put into this endeavor, it is really quite shocking.
I am guessing these users excluding me from DT cannot point to a single negative feedback that I've left that should legitimately be excluded from the default trust network, nor a single positive feedback I've received that they've excluded from the network legitimately. The fact I am currently excluded from Default Trust is a sign of how compromised the network is, not a sign of my trustworthiness. I am still the sole holder of more than a million dollars in funds on behalf of users on this site, not including the millions of dollars held on private keys I have engraved for users here. Something that I doubt many of the other DT members can claim.
I am guessing these users excluding me from DT cannot point to a single negative feedback that I've left that should legitimately be excluded from the default trust network, nor a single positive feedback I've received that they've excluded from the network legitimately. The fact I am currently excluded from Default Trust is a sign of how compromised the network is, not a sign of my trustworthiness. I am still the sole holder of more than a million dollars in funds on behalf of users on this site, not including the millions of dollars held on private keys I have engraved for users here. Something that I doubt many of the other DT members can claim.
As the longest running DT holder who has donated more to the forum than OgNasty, I can write with absolute certainty that his exclusion is due to his many scams. He cannot name the users he "holds coins" for, nor does he have access to any private keys. OgNasty has joked about this for a decade now.
I was shocked when I saw the number of posts OgNasty had deleted. Not as shocked (more numb) of his Trump type claim that ibminer, anonymousminer, eoakland, TMAN, Hellot, TwitchySeal and myself (right now) are corrupt liars and he is an innocent person. In reality, the default trust network is in a growing state of equilibrium and stability. Members that try to abuse their power are removed; there is little infighting and the pedo promotion has been stopped. Once protected by the administrator, OgNasty is limited to posting in non important threads and avoiding real time conversation - like the coward he has always been.