Is it a contest that we’re choosing sides or a competition of investments… Kelward is just saying we can’t totally condemn trading just because we’re not doing it or we feel it’s a bad investment. The thing is Trading is highly risky and it’s not advised for newbies to get into, it’s complicated not as simple as investing.
This thread is for talking about buying bitcoin, growing and maintaining your investment, I guess that’s why many here don’t support the idea of trading.
I don’t know if some of the people who post here are aware of this, that there are people who make gains from trading, no matter how bad it might seem to you.
Even if we promote investment by Dollar Cost Average, trading and gambling will always be a means for people.
You are the one that's misunderstanding everything, no one is taking side as perceived by you, it is funny, you said we can't totally condemn trading because we are not into it that's sound like statement of a trader then, so I want to ask you, something that you think thats not good for newbies to partake in this space, do you think such is really adviseable generally, there are reasons why we condemn the so called trading, that reason is the risk you mentioned, don't you think instead of investors to risk their money in trading, it will be better for them to invest it in bitcoin either gradually or at once as they can at ease?, did I just see you say that trading is not as easy as investing in bitcoin, if so, why the whole drama.
So if gambling and trading is means of survival for some people, are you advising people to take the two up as their major source of income because the last time i checked, gambling and trading has much uncertainty surrounding them and people still lose while engaging fully or halfway in both, so can I please know your stand, dont continue playing smart by dangling around, just be specific and stand your ground because as it is, I don't know the category you belong to, if you're a trader or an investor although the choice is yours, the decision is personal too.