Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
Mafioso246
on 08/08/2025, 09:18:08 UTC
Don't say this nonsense in this thread. What I said has nothing to do with standard transaction sending methods. Everyone has been using this method since the beginning of Bitcoin. Your nonsense is a misleading way of breaking the standard and normal principles of sending transactions. So stop telling your lies. Are you getting paid by Slipstream for these ads?

We all know what happened to the people who sent the transaction the normal way, and we know what happened to those who used Slipstream.

We’ve already played this game once; in the end, I won that round. There are already tests:

Mempool bot competition #2:

Address: 12B2uyEpoRsLDmJDLHJK5n4LeG946XtqM2
Puzzle 75 address space.
30 usd price.
Public key will be exposed tomorrow 27 June 2025 between 13.00 and 14.00 UTC.
Every participant BTC address which will be visible at least once in mempool RBF timeline will get 10 usd in BTC.

Thanks.

Be smart and use it: https://github.com/onepuzzle/btc-transaction


He doesn’t see it because he hasn’t read it and even if he does, he won’t understand what he’s reading. Maybe it’s a language barrier, but I doubt it. Right now, he’s probably trying to figure out what “kangaroo” or “bsgs” even means. If he’s testing RetiredCoder’s kangaroo implementation or WP’s fork, I’m almost certain he’ll see the results and think: “Omg, I found it so quickly! I should definitely try this on 135 too.” Then he’ll start brute-forcing that.

When he realizes it doesn’t work the same way, he’ll be disappointed. And of course, he’ll vanish into silence and return 3–5 months later with a new account and start posting again. Sadly, that’s the cycle this thread seems to follow for some users.

What I’ve come to understand is that being literate doesn’t mean you actually comprehend what you read. For the first time, I felt like I was talking to a wall. It’s sad, but true.


Why do you resist understanding? Those who talk a lot think less!

From now on, I’ll just ignore you. Trying to understand a 48 year old teenager who seeks attention by saying 'I found these with just simple Python code" but using someone else’s list' is pointless. I wish you success, I truly hope you’re the one who finds 71, transfers it the in your groundbreaking way, and that others are genuinely happy about it.