You don't have to delude us here because their are many reasons why Bitcoin is called cryptocurrency;
There is no reason to be being vague about what the fuck you are talking about, and if you are talking about bitcoin why don't
you say it? If you want to talk about bitcoin and shitcoins or you have some reason to proclaim that you are not just talking about bitcoin, then there is nothing wrong with that as long as you are clear about what you are talking a out... and even why is it relevant?
Is there some kind of point that you are wanting to make about shitcoins?
Do you think that there is an investment that is "cryptocurrencies".?
...
@wakate might think he is referring to bitcoin specifically when he called it cryptocurrency in his comments but he doesn't know that could be misleading because the term cryptocurrency would mean not just bitcoin but all other shitcoins which are not bitcoin and can't be relied on for an investment how much more for a sustainable investment strategy (progress portfolio growth).
I think we should be obvious when we talking about bitcoin we should maintain the nomenclature "bitcoin" throughout the discussion from when we are talking about cryptocurrency as in other shitty coins. It would help a reader understands easily than using it ambiguously.
U can't be referring to Bitcoin using cryptocurrency, is that not misleading? @wakate. . To ensure clarity any where much more in a designated location like this —mostly discussing Bitcoin as a sustainable investment strategy—Bitcoin should consistently be used rather than the hazy helpless term "cryptocurrency." This distinction speaks louder by helping readers (especially newcomers) clearly differentiate Bitcoin from shitcoins and to better comprehend the uniqueness of Bitcoin to portfolio growth.