No, they should not. Should early investors of Apple also get a Nobel prize? Rewarding people for investing successfully early is not good for a Nobel prize. Only Satoshi should get all the prizes possible. Actually they should organize to create a Satoshi Prize.
First we should know what is a Nobel Prize is about..., it is about an act of a person or a group that benefited mankind to a huge extent. According to the site:
https://www.nobelprize.org/the-nobel-prize-organisation/, the reward is given to people who...
This is why he created a prize that would reward the discoveries that have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind. Since 1901, the Nobel Prize has been awarded in the fields of physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, literature and peace, while a memorial prize in economic sciences was added in 1968.
Now the question is, are these people who owns Bitcoin in its early phase contribute to the categories stated on the quoted statement from
https://www.nobelprize.org/the-nobel-prize-organisation/? If it was Satoshi Nakamoto, I believe he is qualified, but the problem is that he is unknown, but the early owners.... I have a second thought.
Early investors of anything did not contribute to mankind, neither does being philanthropic or so. Nobel prize should be reserved for actual advancements of science and similar progress. Satoshi should get one, the Bitcoin owners no.