I have less experience on poker tournaments but at least on that game you have an edge if you are good on poker. I remember watching a lot of poker tournaments that low chips manage to beat the highest chip by continuously winning an all-in round with good hands.
On casino wagering contest like this one, it’s almost impossible to beat a high bankroll player if he is committed to win the tournament.
This is the sad reality for small bankroll player.
Yes, limited chips sometimes mean we have to be able to survive our opponents' attacks, otherwise we'll be eliminated from the tournament. We have to be careful in our play, waiting for the right moment to bet or fight other players. More skilled players can make better decisions and exploit the situation more effectively. Patience is key even with limited capital, we can still turn the tables. Yes, a large bankroll is certainly an advantage in this case, giving them more freedom to bluff their opponents.
It’s true because we have limited chances or one miss you die scenario which is crucial game unlike huge bankroll player that is still okay regardless if they will bet in equivalent to your all in hands.
Assuming both player has same skills, it’s always the huge bankroll gambler will win due to the much better try to beat the small bankroll player with good hands.