I agree with him, we would definitely see all memecoins as something that would only be done by devs to make money and nothing more. I have to realize that this will become a lot more problematic if people keep on doing the same thing then it would not make sense. Think about it, devs only do it to make money for themselves and they do not care about it at all, so it makes no sense for investors to keep investing into it.
That isn't a reasonable approach, so we can't really put this into investors since if they can find a way to improve then we are going to change things a lot further. If we do that, like keep investing, then we are only going to make money for them and nothing will be good for us at all.
You’re right that this is the perception many people have. When a space gets filled with short-term grabs and projects that exist only to enrich the creators, it becomes harder for anyone to take it seriously. That cycle eventually damages the entire ecosystem because it trains investors to expect disappointment.
The crypto world moves fast. What’s trending today can fade tomorrow, and memecoins come and go just like serious projects do. That’s why I think a mixed approach is worth considering. Something that fits the fun, viral nature of meme culture, but still has tangible value to give back to holders. A “hybrid coin” could be the way to describe this combining the energy of a meme with the staying power of a project that actually delivers something.
Yes, and this is should be something on your mind and not to think something else because if you've been that too optimistic about on the reason on why these tokens being created then there's no such thing about being a meme coin on which we do all know that this is just that typical some sort of joke coin nothingless. If we do consider on how many meme coins that we do have in the market today then we can definitely say that it is that being flooded out, but surprisingly there are tons of people who are that getting fond of when dealing up with these tokens just because they've been that believing that they can make money with it which is that a very bad mentality of you when you do pushes up yourself on investing into something on which you do know that have that higher risks in comparing when you are trying out to invest into those known and established coins. There are just that those times that you do become that too optimistic about into your investment with meme token. Its best that you should be just that only investing into the amount that you can afford to lose and pull off those profits as much as you can then rinse and repeat.
There's no such thing about being a perfect meme coin or on whose been trying out to make one because if we do speak on something that could sustain, then the best approach would be investing into those solid coins in the market and not just that wasting up your time into those meme coins on which arent that totally that worth on wasting up your money. The real deal on here is that they would be that careful on what they've been investing into so that you wont be finding yourself having some issues about losing up that much money.
The safest move for most people will always be sticking to established coins, and for anyone jumping into higher-risk areas, taking profits and limiting exposure makes sense. At the same time, the market has always had a space for speculation and high-volatility plays.
For many, buying into meme coins is a bit like buying a lottery ticket. Some approach it as a calculated move, aiming for a quick 3–5x flip, while others simply don’t know any better and get caught up in the hype. That’s why mindset matters just as much as the project itself. If people go in with clear goals and exit plans, even the riskier plays can be managed without turning into a disaster.
I think you've got the priorities backwards.
First, people need to understand exactly how they will make a profit. Second, they need to believe that this profit is sustainable long-term. Only after that should you start pushing all the utility and other benefits. For instance, "saving the world" is always a popular theme—you could tie your project to green tech.
You were probably hoping I would suggest some new crypto technology, but I wouldn't go there. The market is full of great projects with solid tech that never get enough attention or funding. Meanwhile, a crypto pyramid scheme like Terra (LUNA) got into the top 10 purely because UST staking offered a fake 20% APY.
There are many types of investors, and not everyone is chasing short-term gains. The ones aiming for a 10–20x flip rarely see real profits to materialize. When talk about 1000x or more, I’d be curious to know what percentage of people who bought PEPE or Shiba right at the beginning are still holding today.
If a project is going to succeed, it needs a solid foundation first. A lot of coins are doomed from the start because of flawed tokenomics and a careless setup. Building a token is like growing a tree—mistakes made early will shape whether it grows strong or dies off. Creating something with no real purpose might ride a wave for a while, but it’s never going to be a sustainable long-term idea.