Fact is bitcoin adoption by state comes with regulations, which means a lose of privacy and freedom for bitcoin holder's due to centralized presence, well there is no way state will adopt bitcoin without regulations.
How? The state adopting Bitcoin and making regulations has had no impact on me. Neither is my spending limited, nor do they know where my coins are. Where is this negative impact of which you speak?
Go back and read my comment again; i didn't say state adoption will automatically mean a negative impact, because at some point we need those state actors and regulations to frame the operational policies for cryptocurrency adoption.
Whaz i was pointing to is a bit different from what you understand in all of this, what i meant was the regulations and ushering in of more control of government over cryptocurrency assets unlike the free market that we have right now.
You are still not explaining how I will lose my privacy and freedom, you just wrote again the same thing using different words. No government regulation can make me lose my freedom, Bitcoin would not be Bitcoin if it didn't guarantee freedom through its existence.