[...]
@holy stop quoting that rule in the ToS. You are taking it back to the previous case. Books can cancel before the match, not after. Suspicious activity means something such as match fixing.
If you come across something for the first time, don’t try to learn from only looking at the ToS. Look at previous cases and industry standards.
Why should holy stop quoting
that rule in the ToS? It's the binding agreement between the player and the casino, where the casino reserves the right to refuse, restrict, cancel, or limit any bet, as well as voiding them in case of suspicion of unfair activity. So why should the clauses covering the matter not being quoted by holy? And further, does unfair activity specifically means strictly to match fixing? No other instances that can be categorized as unfair? Placing late bets where results already known is not unfair?