And the lines weren't even off in the dplay case. They have to stop pretending they have secret evidence. The OP was profiled so that was already done. Holy said they were watching him for a long time. I'll stick with they needed 10 minutes, not days, hours or months for this free-roll.
holy quote
holy quote
Quote
They have their eyes on you for so long for the technique you're utilizing
This does seem incriminating for the casino if they "had their eyes on me for so long" and only decided to do something about it when I won a large amount of money in a short timespan.
Hmm... I'll have to chip in as the words being quoted and used to mislead is my post here.
The original and exact words on the post, if not snipped and fashioned in such way, will tell you that the one having an eye on you is the provider, not the casino.
[...]
and I regret to inform you that based from the information they provided, not only they have that right, from 6.1., but also further emphasized with an enough reason to void [so the call was not done baselessly or out of grudge or other malicious intent] as per 6.4.3., unfair practice, which was flagged by their provider.
They have their eyes on you for so long for the technique you're utilizing, and I'll do the courtesy of not divulging to the public of your betting strategy that they and their provider deemed as a violation. But given they've set their eyes on you for so long, that the provider flag you as a very high risk bettor, I believe you've repeat this more than plenty and fully know what you're doing.
[...]
and I regret to inform you that based from the information they provided, not only they have that right, from 6.1., but also further emphasized with an enough reason to void [so the call was not done baselessly or out of grudge or other malicious intent] as per 6.4.3., unfair practice, which was flagged by their provider.
They have their eyes on you for so long for the technique you're utilizing, and I'll do the courtesy of not divulging to the public of your betting strategy that they and their provider deemed as a violation. But given they've set their eyes on you for so long, that the provider flag you as a very high risk bettor, I believe you've repeat this more than plenty and fully know what you're doing.
[...]
I read the post in between the time I handle IRL matters and re-read the paragraph and attempting it from different angle to understand how someone could misinterpret it as the casino having their eyes on you. Granted, due to the numerous use of "they" and "their" and the equivalent pronouns, the who do what can probably be misunderstood. But who I referred in that post, I think, in that exact construction instead of snipped very partially, indicates who I refer to being watching you.
I even asked a second "neutral" opinion,
Hope that clarifies things.