I don't agree with this, but why do the teams with more money always win? I really don't understand this thing, it's not meritocratic, everyone wants to go to these teams to win but also for the money, taking the soul away from such a beautiful game.
This is laughable. Was there ever a time that the winners were not the club with more money? Look at the most successful clubs in the world; they have always been the biggest clubs, so what soul is it taking away?
When Manchester United, Liverpool, AC Milan, Inter Milan, Juventus, and Real Madrid were the biggest teams in the world, were they not the most successful? Has there ever been a time when big players have not wanted to go to big teams? It has always been their team to play for big teams, so I don't see what soul is being taken away because nothing has changed except now, there is way more money.
Having the money alone doesn't make a club successful; the club will also have to be run properly. When a club is run properly and has the money, it signs better players, coaches, and other technical staff and sporting directors. It's like that in spheres of life, to just football. The bigger and better-structured political parties win elections, too.
Football has tried to level the playing field by having FFP. This way, clubs can't sign players as much as they want.