Once again your little story has a fatal flaw which you're just refusing to address. If Hamas has enough food to last whole Palestine until year 3036 why not allow UN bring more food in and do with it as they wish? According to your logic HAMAS is swimming in food, so additional food wouldn't be of any benefit to HAMAS, then why prevent UN from delivering it? Why can't Israel just say that from now on UN can bring as much food and water as they wish, they can flood whole Gaza with baby formula?
you are so void of thinking that i might have to declare you braindead as you are lacking to use even the simplist of braincells now
a. 2026 not 3036b. UN dont want to go inside of the border go give to hamas... hamas dont want to come to the border to collect. hamas only want to get supplies the ambush on route inside gaza via other aid agencies willing to take that riskc. yes hamas is swimming with food, so much so the hamas troops are looking bloated compared to the hostages, prisoners they keep. hamas sell food at illegal markets at 15x pre war price. but they cant just let the innocent palestinians have it for free or hamas would lose dependancy of the palestinians
d. hamas are not preventing UN, its UN that want to leave it at the border for hamas to get. again un too afraid to send trucks with a security team because UN dont want their guys turning into political prisoners like what happened in 2023-24. isreeeal even said isreal and GHF will ship it in for UN but UN said they dont want anyone else touching it unless its hamas at the border
hams are setting alot of evil precedents which can be used in some future asian war.
setting up makeshift hospitals which become supposed no-kill zones.. but in actuality militia use these as outposts.. suddenly makes incursions and stuff harder without it being declared a war crime
when you look at the average number of hospitals per capita of any country. then look at the hospitals per capita of gaza. you start to see this outlier pattern. but if you then want to say they are hospitals due to war injuries. then look at the number of beds of such hospitals in gaza.. they have many hospitals but very few beds per hospital, not enough for a normal war based triage centre. you then look at all the tunnels built underneath and then satellite images of troop movements between hospitals, and the arms and ammo equipment found in hospitals to realise these hospitals are more so used as military outposts.. which as said at start of this paragraph is a military tactic asia could copy in its own defence plans of what is call 'lawfare'
from 2005 hamas got highly sponsored/funded to build STRATEGIC hospitals to play lawfare games of cowardliness to try to trap isreal into warcrimes. however isreal sent alot or warnings and intel to all concerned parties to show how, why and when an area was to become a battlefield. and as said in other posts if hamas were not cowards to use so called civilian infrustructure as outposts, the area's concerned would not become hamas hotspots and thus would not become targets
"again you keep switching the word from hamas troops and their families/associates. to try to make it sound like innocent random palestinian.. see how bad you are at separating to two.. heck you cant even see the difference. and thats why you are blind and stupid in these discussions"
It's quiet obvious that by your definition there are no more Palestinians in Gaza, because i doubt a single one of them wishes peace upon Israel now. Which coincidentally works out for Israel, if we declare everyone that doesn't like us as terrorists, then we can destroy all terrorists...
there are 2m civilians. only a few dozen thousand hamas and a few dozen hamas friends, family associates, allegiant to hamas
2m are not dead. and if you count up the number of dead the numbers support it being hamas and hamas allegient parties that refuse to step away from notified hamas hotspots
YOU are the one pretending hamas are part of the civilians which you just want to brush as being "palestinians"
Article 50 - Definition of civilians and civilian population
1. A civilian is any person who does not belong to one of the categories of persons referred to in Article 4 A (1), (2), (3) and (6) of the Third Convention and in Article 43 of this Protocol. In case of doubt whether a person is a civilian, that person shall be considered to be a civilian.
2. The civilian population comprises all persons who are civilians.
3. The presence within the civilian population of individuals who do not come within the definition of civilians does not deprive the population of its civilian character.
Ugh that annoying Geneva convention again.
yes those who are not drafted/conscripted troops are civilian, but they are still majority affiliated to hamas by familial or other reasons, which is why i call them collateral damage
YOU are the one that pretends all 2m are randomly being shot without any reason.. i am trying to get you to see the separations of why certain people remain in hamas hotspots and why they become collateral damage when HAMAS ARE THE TARGETS and the collateral damage of civilians relate to the HAMAS as TARGETS
So in the whole world civilians are defined essentially as all individuals who do not belong to the armed forces or combatant categories. And civilians should be protected under Geneva convention. But what you're saying is that Israelis are some super race above Palestinians because they can treat Palestinians differently from all other humans? Instead Israel should be allowed to administer it's own purity test which would created different classes of Palestinian civilians "what makes them different to innocent palestinians.. not skull sizes" and "true innocent unaffiliated people". How should those civilians who are non combatants but don't pass Israeli's civilian purity test be separated from "innocent unaffiliated civilians"? Have you considering tattooing some numbers on them for easy identification? Hitler would've been so proud of you!
again isreal send warnings.. isreal give innocent palestinians a chance to find safer area's to vacate to.. its YOU that think civilians should not move when hamas make things a hotspot. thus its YOU that want more civilians killed
YOU think isrealis should not attack hamas because hamas keep their kids and wives at the hips.. and thats what a evil vile person would think, to use their own family as a shield simply because "they are civilian".. doing so as a tactic for the terror group known as hamas to do its vile acts without ever being drawn on, becasue they think they are safe by keeping "civilians" at the hip
you need to realise hamas are cowards, they dont want to travel to get away from family and actually battle their adversaries far from family and friends, so that their family and friends are safe. they instead want to keep family close so that when hamas troops and family are killed, other troops can pretend there was no reason for the families deaths and then say the families should not have died, and try to call it a war crime, pretending hamas affiliated people were not affiliated but just innocents
wake up to what hamas tactics are, using their own kin and associates as human shields and then also conscripting, blackmailing, ordering, demanding others into staying put to become human shields for the cowards known as hamas