If the dev is against it, we will not do so. Another option is to see if we can help him out with some things. A lot of people voted to elect the coin, so there is obviously something that needs to be done.
So, basically, you have no idea?What the foundation wants to do for GPUcoin:
1. Create new bitcointalk where the foundation is the Dev.
2. Create new github source that can be updated to be ad up-to-date as possible
3. Release new wallets.
4. Elect a new representative of the coin to run the communications.
1. Create new bitcointalk where the foundation is the Dev.
2. Create new github source that can be updated to be ad up-to-date as possible
3. Release new wallets.
4. Elect a new representative of the coin to run the communications.
The coin does not really need any of this, although other coins might actually do.
The problems with this coin are
1) that the front end died
2) nobody had an idea how to make a successful cashflow
Basically the economy behind the currency failed. You can not fix an economy with software updates, man. Updating wallets and bitcointalk threads wont result in a flow of GPUs to buy with GPUcoins. If you are not going to revive the store (by either investing your own money, IPO or liquid magic) you might aswell just leave this coin to die and focus your efforts somewhere where you can make a difference.
I am not saying that what you are doing is negative in any way, I am just saying that selecting GPUc for a Revival was a bad choice.
Lol I would like to see Jaymes reaction once he reads this. 
Its like stealing the coin behind his back. I am not saying we should not but I am sure he will be quite surprised.
Its like stealing the coin behind his back. I am not saying we should not but I am sure he will be quite surprised.Whats with the "we" again? I think that you have done enough for this coin.