
Between these two players who is best to be at the club and who should be sold out? Hojlund has made it clear that he wants to stay and struggle for his place at the club but that's not the problem of the board because they want him to leave, like is a must for the player to make a move. Joshua Zirkzee too hasn't been up to his best and both players have not done anything special for the club ever since joining the side. To me I feel both players need to leave and find any club that can bring out the best in them because staying at Manchester United won't change anything for them, unless they prefer to sit on the bench till the end of the season.
Both have not been able to show a good impact for Man Utd, but if they have to choose, maybe Zirkzee can be kept, giving him a chance is not wrong, besides Man Utd must consider that if one day Sesko has problems, Zirkzee can be a good replacement compared to Hojlund, another reason I heard Man Utd is currently more focused on selling Hojlund as soon as possible, this means there is a possibility that Man Utd will give Zirkzee a chance to stay.
Zirkzee can be the chosen one to stay at the club but I see no reason to keep both players because with the two players combined they couldn't give up to 20 goals and their performance wasn't something to write home about. The manager can give Zirkzee a chance to redeem himself only on FA Cup or Carabao and also for him to be a back up striker that's if they sub Benjamin Šeško or if he has any form of injury.
Zirkzee will stay from the news we have been seeing but we what I have seen in their last game I can't imagine Zirkzee keeping up to the speed at which Mbeumo and Cunha are bringing to the team, UTD need someone who can keep up that style of play and Zirkzee or the other one Hojlund isn't the type, is best if the manager get someone to replace both players, maybe do a swap to get a better striker to support Benjamin.