Use statistic.
Zirkzee, 49 matches, 7 goals = 14%
Hojlund, 95 matches, 26 goals = 27%
This mean Hojlund has almost double the chance to score a goal compared to Zirkzee.
If I'm the one who make decision, I want Hojlund to stay and sell Zirkzee. Amorim is joking he prefer Mount over both of them, Mount has 8% chance because he played for 48 matches and only score 4 goals.
Both are average players if you ask me, Hojlund has played almost 100 matches and hasn't yet scored up to 30 goals and Zirkzee has played almost 50 matches with less than 10 goals to his name for the club. Both of them combined has played almost 150 matches and scored not up to 40 goals, that's a very poor statistics.
As for Mount, I don't even know the problem of Amorim, Mount should be dashed out for free.Com'on man, this is just too hilarious, which team do you think will accept such a player that is seriously out of form and is earning so much?
Only his salary alone makes it's very difficult to sell him off because no reasonable club will want to be paying him so much when he is giving out little or nothing in the field of play,
As for the likes of Hojlund and zirkzee, especially Hojlund, he is not a bad player in my own opinion, just that he just can't adapt to the fast pace of the English premier league, and it's high time Manchester united hierarchy accept that fact that they have wasted money on this guy's, but thinking that they can recoup back the money wasted on them is what will never happen because no team will even pay close to the amount that was spent on them, so they should just accept the loss and move on.