Do you even... read and try to understand what I wrote in the first place? Or you literally ranting like a five years old on the first read without digesting them?

The money laundering message, the AML-action response, is Rollbit's blanket statement for whatever clause their player breached. He's very much likely not a money launderer, the AML counter-accusation Rollbit gave as their verdict is a global response they give as their verdict, just like suspicion of multi-account being their blanket statement that invites their player to email their compliance team, of which players' actual cases will then be sorted out and got into its bottom.

You want the childish name given to you to stop being uttered? Then behave like an adult and try to understand a situation in a non-biased manner before jumping into posting gibberish. How exactly do you want people to treat you like an adult if whatever comes from your keyboard is almost an equivalent of a five years old's rant that tries to looks important?

Want to say I'm the one throwing tantrum instead of you actually admitting that you uttered gibberish? Read this thread again from the point I jumped in and explained what OP asked. There was no single indication of me ruling against the player, I am simply explaining from what Razer explained to me, in addition to what I witnessed myself upon piles of Rollbit's response on this SA board following their most recent approach to handle cases. And you still come into conclusion that I am ruling against player/sports bettor?