Com'on man, shit coin is shit coin, you are just here having a blind argument here by stating how Ethereum is less shitty than other shit coin, and it's high time you stop referring Bitcoin as a crypto because by doing so, you are making it looks like bitcoin is part of that shit show going on in the crypto industry, so when talking about Bitcoin, be specific.
Take note that I am not against you gambling with shit coin, or seeing Ethereum less shitty, but stop addressing Bitcoin as cryptocurrency, because by do so, you are making it looks as if Bitcoin is part of the shit coin in the crypto industry.
Bitcoin still is a crypotcurrency irrespective of how it performs. Even if it reached $1m a coin it still is a cryptocurrency because it is made on the foundations of a cryptography. You cant say that Bitcoin is not a cryptocurrency because it performed well or is stable and you cant say a shitcoin is a cryptocurrency because it is shit. Being a cryptocurrency is not a measure of how good you perform. Love For Bitcoin is okay but that doesnt mean you can ignore its main foundation because some coins failed on delivering the same like Bitcoin.
We call a male cow a calf, we do not call it a bull at the beginning. The reason for this is that the calf has not yet reached its mature age in terms of its physical structure and strength and above all its value. This was a small example. Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency there is no doubt about it but over time its structure and demand have changed in such a way that you cannot match it with other currencies. That is why if you call this digital asset cryptocurrency, many people may think it makes sense like other shitcoins. Especially those who are new investors. I think you should call it Bitcoin. It may also be logical to call it a digital asset.