My question is; is this actually right? I think this assets are supposed to auction or sold off?
In majority of cases they do sell seized assets, but afaik they don't have to do it if they think they can use it some other way, like for example seized cars. And even if there wa a rule that they have to sell it, they could easily change that law in order to keep whatever they want.
Does Not buying bitcoin actually signifies that they don’t believe in bitcoin at all and are only fulfilling campaign promises.
Let me ask you this: does them not selling seized bitcoin signifies that they "believe" in bitcoin?