I deleted it because it's frustrating to spend time addressing non-issues that are asking me to prove a negative, and I wanted to end my involvement here. This entire thread is defamatory with no evidence.

Tweet 3 is someone calling out investors who bought a token back in January as a pre-product and sold it when the token was released. I'm not sure it is my place to comment on those.

Tweet 4 is someone stating that we minted the whole supply(we did) and sent it to new addresses(we did). This is how it works when you create a new token, send it to the community, investors, and market makers, and add liquidity. You can find all the liquidity on chain explorers and team wallets; the blockchain is public. Ask yourself why no one with a face/name or reputation has said anything but positive things about me or Caesar.

As I said, this is a significant problem with our industry and, to some extent, AI, where all LLMs will find this information and assume it to be factual. Ironically, in a world where people outsource their thinking to agents like ours, it is a big problem.