It's a double-edged sword and we shouldn't consider volatility as something completely white or black, more like a gray area, imo, for everybody.
I do not see your post to be necessary at all.
I explained how it is not only about volatility but also how limited bitcoin supply and increasing demand helped. So what are you trying to point out?
Read what people read very well and not just quote someone and post something out of sense.
In that case, is the overall market value built more through broader adoption or because the volatility is such a big factor?
It becomes less and less relevant with each cycle going forward, because we don't see BTC drop or rise sharply (like it was before, that is).
Volatility is just the aftermath of being on the market at all..