This is a very good thing, but ultimately it can also be optional, especially for the first point I want to highlight.
Investing in a single asset is risky, but ultimately we also need to consider how much capital we are putting into the investment. If our capital is still relatively small but we spread it across several assets, this will not be optimal, so it becomes optional for me.
For other investments, such as in real estate, it is indeed still very good to try diversifying across several sectors, but ultimately this also comes back to the initial issue where capital is always one of the key factors that must be considered first. This is important because ultimately, we don’t want the diversification we aim to achieve to backfire because we don’t have enough funds but force it anyway, resulting in suboptimal outcomes.
Those who have low capital would have to focus on an asset they can afford. Real estate is capital-intensive because the cost of land and building is high. But there are still less expensive lands in rural areas that can be afforded by low-income earners. There are still other investment options like bonds, treasury bills, and so on, but none is as profitable as Bitcoin. Bitcoin is suitable for all because it can be bought in bits.