Thanks for the clarification, now I know more about the main difference between a burner wallet and a buffer wallet, so this all revolves around retrieving funds if anything goes wrong because a burner wallet for this purpose will be very risky especially with higher funds.
You are welcome!
We will also add this information to the GitBook page a bit later for easier reference.
That is good to know about the collection module, because third party code usually brings more errors and there is always fear of getting hacked because there are many real examples, exchanges are using third-party modules in their core system and its compromise helps hackers to steal money.
Please also keep in mind that we don't rely on any third-party tools.
The entire backend has been fully developed in-house by us.
That's great, things are simple and human friendly while machine friendly at the same time.
That's the reason we chose to build the system as semi-decentralized instead of fully decentralized.
So there is a minimum exchange amount in beta too, I did not knew before thanks for the clarification and this is so true that getting funds from faucet is a problem but I might have some T.eth in my wallet so it won't be a problem.
The dead wallet and dust transaction is a real problem then because if some amount left in those buffer wallet that will be not good for both parties. You have thought it through. Good Luck.
Yes, there is a minimum exchange value, which unfortunately will need to be raised on mainnet. That said, we will do our best to keep it as low as possible.
You can check our
GitBook page for instructions on how to test all available networks on the exchange, and we've also provided faucet links there to make testing easier.
Dead Wallet and Dust Transactions are not actual problems.
We are simply researching and fine-tuning the values to prevent them in all future transactions. The Beta phase showed us that these areas need a double-check, but once adjusted, they won't be an issue at all.