Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Betfury cancelled $300,000 worth of bets
by
Rating Place
on 22/08/2025, 21:20:10 UTC
[...]
I understand that part. I'm merely pointing out the fact that claiming fraud requires evidence. You seem to call me out as a fraudster/abuser/cheater/whatever in most your posts. Yet no one has provided any evidence.


I honestly thought that the person who said he'll take over, will get this document unsealed and published, or perhaps get a better outcome. Though unfortunately the step he do is perhaps a literal five minutes case, that is the time needed to type an instruction to escalate to higher authority. Of which... I think you did? Haven't you? Or if you have, what's the verdict of it?


I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're asking.
[...]

Oh, it was answered on your reply to JollyGood [I snipped the part as well as your earlier post as it'll be a very long quote otherwise]. To put it simply, I was wondering too if you've escalate to higher authority, like lawsuit and court, license provider, or other suggested approach by others, following the failed attempt to settle.

As for evidence, I do apologize to you that I can't help on that. If I may repeat and clarify:

One, it's because the evidence provided is understandably stamped as confidential and set to private-eyes-only, as it probably contains methods that casinos use to detect abuses. That, upon being published, will harm the casino's algorithm as well as other casinos' anti-fraud technique [call it anti-ToS-breach, if you want it to sound more neutral]. Regardless of your consent for your private data to be released or not, this data can not be released without their approval as it is their data, not yours. Might sounds a bit confusing, but I hope you can grasp the concept. This is a known concept that can be grasped by most overseers of this board.

Two, and most importantly, like I said here, following our attempt to get you a settlement, I drop everything and [still don't mean to  be rude] couldn't care less who said what and who do what and whatnot, as I focused myself to try to get your case to be closed by settlement. Of which failed.

Following that chase of settlement, I also dropped my attempt to get them to publish something that can support their verdict. And following the failed attempt to settle, someone reached me and said they will take over, of whom I had my high hope that they can continue where I left [the whodunnit part, not the settlement, as settlement was clearly already a dead end] and get the supporting evidence unearthed, as they wrote publicly that they have years of arbitration.
why do you need to look at this confidential information? Bet Fury had the information and still let the OP play. Since they allowed the play, they have to pay winnings. Nothing that is confidential matters.