~snip
I don't really think that his definition of greed is totally wrong, I think you saying he's completely wrong is a bold statement as there are people who can see his definition and still Mark him good with his definition of greed. You know this thing call greed can be viewed differently by different scholars. That's why a wise man once said; where ones greed end's, that's where another man's greed starts. That's being said, greeds are in levels, he's right with his definition of greed, and you are also very much correct with your own definition as well.
What you are insinuating is that I am wrong and he is right. You should have come clean instead of beating around the bush.
Well, I wasn't trying to prove him completely wrong or right, I only wanted to make my obvious observations. And also make him to understand that people's views on things can differs. Many folks will accept his definition because that's what they do. While a lot of folks will agree with me because our view of greed is totally different.
I have read from the nursery of you both comments on the subject from the OP. In this argument between you two, I only see two different perspectives that are compelling but both right.
One limits the definition of greed to within the corridors of financial pursuit. Meanwhile the other user's definition of greed doesn't just stand in the scope of financial pursuit but unlimited to every achievements in life that one wants to achieve.