You should at least take time to read through my post, I never in anyway said you were wrong. It was you that said the Op was wrong, and you gave further explanation to back your claims. I went through the op post and went through yous and I found out that neither your explanation nor the op own was wrong about the subject matter, of which I said that in my previous post. There was a place in your previous post were you said the Op was wrong with his definition of greed, but you now saying you weren't trying to prove him completely wrong or right is what I don't understand. Someone can either be wrong or right at a time. You can't turn around and want to sit on the fence, you have to make your position known, because I think you are the person now beating around the bush that you were accusing me of.
In as much as I would like to prolong this argument but Ill leave it here for now. I want to believe that we were neither wrong or right as the case may be. And like I said earlier, everyone has their definition of things. The way they see it, view it, and how those things relate to their daily lives can be different from mine. So who am I to judge someone. With that being said, its what pushes for discussions and argument and at the end of the day, we may find out we have been wrong all these while. No problem mate, everywhere is good.