We are also planning to launch let's say, a Coin List Vote, so the community can decide which assets should be added next.
That is a good idea and verified users can vote for any coin they want to see on the platform, this will make this platform very unique from many competitors and everyone can help shape a better platform.
The challenge, of course, is monetization.
We would still need to cover server costs and sustain our own work.
As you know, projects built purely on enthusiasm are hard to support long-term without a funding model.
So what do you think: Should we aim for 100% fee-free exchanges by finding a sustainable way to monetize without relying on a service fee?
Or would it be smarter to balance sustainability with user comfort by introducing a service fee to cover infrastructure and ongoing costs?
What if you will not find any sponsors, that will be a life time problem for the platform, I will suggest you should add service fee and don't even remove the fee for small amounts that trigger dust type problems, I will say solve them, get fee, and sponsors both, because you guys are doing hard work, what if that sponsor will not be enough. Of course, it’s your decision, and I’ll respect whatever you choose. Going fully fee-free would be a noble contribution to the crypto world
Infrastructure and other costs should be covered by the fee structure, no fee structure can be a bad thing, it will then be considered a contribution to the crypto world. It can be the next big thing like many open source contributions happened till now and they have survived till now, so you can also but I think fee structure is better.