Sure, there are only two ways of going about it. At the merit source level or at the campaign level. I don't mind your suggestion either. However, I can already foresee some people giving excuses how managers can do whatever they want and whatnot. A fairly sized block of DefaultTrust members could solve this situation in a few days. However, it seems primarily to me that network aims to preserve the status quo and tries to avoid making changes policy. The lies that we tell ourselves about allegedly decentralized systems are just sad.
I think it is more relevant to analyze the level of campaigns than the merits.
Because merits is a system that involves technical characteristics, more complex and time-consumindo. Changing the way campaigns capture users and manage them is simpler to do.
Of course, maybe managers prefer not to change.
Others think it's okay.
Some think that everything is fine, or that everything is bad.
But, we can still put the moderators on the question. Are they managing to clean up all the low-value posts?
Do they simply ignore some boards?
In the end, we all like to have our status. Now this should not be higher than the whole community.
Looking at my experience, I think most of the time it's more personal disagreements than something so global.
Honestly, I would like to see more complex cases of how these schemes work and actually work.
Can anyone point out a Hero/Legendary user, who has reached that level, for having used this type of scheme?