On the other hand, the influx of institutional capital through ETF and custodial platforms will strengthen Bitcoin's position as a digital store of value, in line with the current trend of asset tokenization and the penetration of CBDC. And network resilience is supported by node decentralization, increasing hash rates, and flexible market-based transaction fees.
The influx of institutional capital through the ETFs will help generate cash inflow, but it is not what strengthens the Bitcoin position as a digital store of value. Mind you, Bitcoin's usage as a digital store of value was strengthened right from the get-go due to its decentralization, consensus mechanism, etc. Presented by Satoshi Nakamoto, not through the influx of institutional capital through the ETFs, which were mainly to benefit from the crypto market, treat Bitcoin like JPG, and also manipulate the market.
As someone who enjoys analyzing and studying technology, I feel that these dynamics, along with the ever-evolving regulations, have led me to believe that Bitcoin has great potential not only as digital gold, but also as a foundational layer for transactions, value settlement, and global financial innovation.
what do you think about it?
I think you're funny for having the belief that ever-evolving regulations are what make Bitcoin have great potential, fundamental for border to border transactions, global financial innovation, and more.
When the potential you stated is what the government and institutions that once said negative things about Bitcoin saw before they decided to talk back their negativity towards BTC and filed for an ETF