How can we interpret this? Are they trying to prolong the Ponzi scheme?
I'm not saying that's the case, but it reminds me of Ponzi schemes where everything goes very well at first, and when it starts to unravel, it doesn't happen overnight. There are simply more people requesting withdrawals and far fewer people depositing. So, at first, what they do is process some withdrawals to try to keep up the appearance that the system is working.
Could we be witnessing something like that?
I don't really understand what would be the strategy behind this. What could be the point of sending money to people till running out if you are doing a Ponzi scheme? The goal is to stop it while being rich no? So why not just closing the platform one year and half ago then? Users have certainly removed more than 90% of their funds since the beginning of the issues in 2024.