Personally, I'm not an entrepreneur, but if I were, I would still support the use of Bitcoin as an alternative transaction method. I believe Bitcoin offers flexibility, transparency, and efficiency across borders, which could be valuable additions to the business world. However, this must be considered rationally, considering the current situation. High price volatility, unstable or inadequate regulation, and limited widespread market acceptance make Bitcoin more suitable as a complement (for now), rather than a primary replacement for cash or conventional payment systems. With this approach, I believe Bitcoin can still be utilized as a tremendous opportunity for business development, without ignoring the realities of the challenges.

I agree with this view that bankroll management is not a good strategy. Its primary function is simply to protect against sudden losses, but to make them more manageable. However, it won't significantly improve the odds. As long as the expected value remains negative, the end result will remain the same, ultimately eroding capital.
On the other hand, I believe strategy is what truly determines the direction of our game. This involves analyzing opportunities, utilizing information, and understanding situations to create an advantage. Therefore, without an approach, bankroll management will only prolong playing time without changing the outcome.

In other words, I believe bankroll management is important for developing discipline and self-control, but it cannot stand alone. Sustainability is possible if it is combined with a strategy that provides a mathematical and logical basis for winning.

I actually feel that if a major country forces Bitcoin mining to use only solar energy, it would seem more like political intervention than a concrete solution. As we know, Bitcoin is inherently energy-neutral; miners will always choose the most efficient and cheapest energy sources, and the global trend is already moving towards renewable energy without regulatory pressure.

This kind of regulation would actually reduce competitiveness for miners in the country that created the regulation because solar energy is not yet stable across the region. As a result, many miners would migrate to other countries with more liberal regulations, where the Bitcoin network would still operate normally thanks to its difficulty adjustment mechanism.

This means that Bitcoin cannot be weakened by unilateral regulations alone. Instead, this kind of regulation would demonstrate the resilience of this network, which always finds its own way out, while also emphasizing that Bitcoin is far stronger than any political or regulatory intervention.