proposed censoring Ordinals inscriptions on-chain via the node software. Glad it didn't work out, otherwise, the community would've been going against Bitcoin's censorship-resistant ideals.
Are people still stuck on this thing?!
Preventing abuse of the protocol and not relaying transactions that are exploiting it is not called censorship. If it were then bitcoin would have always been censored because from very early days we introduced standard rules that have been preventing a large number of abusive usage of Bitcoin and are still not relaying a lot of non-standard transactions.