Bitcoin is built on code, math, and cryptography. But its adoption often depends on stories, memes, and culture.
The “HODL” meme did more for Bitcoin adoption than many technical papers.
Bitcoin art, music, and even fashion seem to push the narrative further.
So I wonder—at this stage, does Bitcoin need more art than code to grow? Or is it dangerous to rely on culture instead of pure technology?
If you need arts, find overwhelming arts with altcoins, tokens especially with Metaverse, NFT arts. They are useless arts which can cost you a lot of money for purchasing them, and at the end lose big money with those useless arts.
Bitcoin can not have value, high value more accurately that is reflected in its high price if it was simply based on "arts".
Memes are funny and can be helpful but only if there are strong fundamentals behind which are only found in Bitcoin. If you want something ionic, artistic and funny, find there.
https://thelittlehodler.com/Gallery
https://thelittlehodler.com/gallery/The comic book
https://thelittlehodler.com/product/100-comics-about-better-money/The shop with different products for sale
https://thelittlehodler.com/shop/