After reading the entire SS conversation I want to highlight this,
That was quick and had a different tone.
Also want to highlight the fact that David's first message about the provider flagging the bet was a complete lie. It was shuffle themselves flagging the bet then asking the provider for an investigation. I've heard of innocent until proven guilty before. I'm hearing about guilty until proven innocent for the first time now.
Do you have proof about this accusation? How come shuffle will flag your bet while the provider itself has access on your bet records done on their game.
Shuffle is paying other user win without any problem. If you are confident that you don’t do wrong then the decision will be in favor to you.
We will request for evidence check once results is already out.